EHL successfully settles litigation over the 2003 Riverside County General Plan
 |
In 2003, EHL filed suit on California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)grounds against Riverside County’s General Plan Update. This suit hasnow been settled to add protections to rural and habitat lands.
Read More |
|
Tribal annexations threaten San Diego and Riverside habitat reserves
|
If private property is purchased by tribes and then annexed intoreservations, the protections called for in regional multiple speciesplans may be lost. EHL is commenting on two such proposals.
Read More |
|
Mid County Parkway proposal amended to respect Riverside MSHCP
|
Earlier this year, EHL expressed concern that the western leg of a new highway would violate conditions contained in the regional multi-species plan. In response to this and to concerns raised by others, the offending alignment has been dropped.
Read More |
|
EHL comments on San Diego County General Plan Update
|
In order to preserve San Diego’s countryside and rich habitats, EHL criticized the “preferred project” in comparison with a land use map developed by planning staff and stakeholders.
Read More |
|
Beasts and Botany by Jess Morton
 |
Ravens
An unkindness of ravens? Oh, I don’t think so!
Read More |
|
